Tuesday, May 31, 2016

The Transport Guy: This is the most addictive game of the year

Steve Kovach May 31, 2016 at 12:20PM

If you needed to find me on a Friday night 16 years ago, I was probably in the spare bedroom of my childhood home playing endless hours of "Team Fortress Classic" online.

team fortress classic

"Team Fortress" was an instant hit. Unlike most shooting games where everyone plays the same character and tries to rack up as many kills as possible, "Team Fortress" required a lot of strategy and planning. There were several classes of characters ranging from medic to sniper, and mastering any of them could make you absolutely lethal. I was a terrible student in high school, but I'm pretty sure if I had dedicated as much time to studying as I did to "Team Fortress," I would have been valedictorian.

Now, here I am at age 30 and equally as addicted to the game's spiritual successor, "Overwatch." Instead of spending Memorial Day weekend at the beach or grilling processed meat like a normal American, I was glued to my PlayStation 4, playing endless rounds of the game.

Roadhog and Junkrat in OverwatchThe concept behind "Overwatch" is very similar to "Team Fortress." You play on small teams and tackle objectives like capturing a checkpoint or moving a payload over the goal line. (Still missing: Capture the flag.) The game is beautifully designed and even has a clever back story, which you can check out by watching these animated shorts on YouTube.

But "Overwatch" is even more addictive than "Team Fortress" because of its deep roster of 21 characters with unique abilities and the fact it lets you change your character in the middle of the game to adapt to your opponents. It keeps every round you play fresh and exciting, forcing you to change your tactics on the fly in order to take down your opponents. My colleague Ben Gilbert described it pretty well: It's like an ever-changing rock/paper/scissors battle.

OverwatchMaybe a checkpoint is overrun with enemies and your team can't seem to get through. Well, switch to D.Va and use her robot suit to boost in the middle of them and blow them to smithereens, kamikaze-style. Maybe you're guarding a payload and want to keep your enemies from coming close at all. Switch to a sniper character like Widowmaker and pick them off from a distance. Maybe one of your teammates is having trouble staying alive long enough to make a difference. Switch to a healer like Mercy and keep their health up as they push through enemy lines.

dva overwatch 2You get the idea. The deep bench of characters keeps every round of "Overwatch" fresh and exciting, even if the goal of the game never changes. And it's only going to get better as Blizzard, the studio that makes "Overwatch," adds more characters and game modes over time.

If you have a PlayStation 4, Xbox One, or a PC and like fun, then you'd be insane not to give "Overwatch" a try. You'll thank me. Your friends and family who want to see you on a regular basis might not.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's the real reason Disney stopped making video games

This is the most addictive game of the year from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

Friday, May 27, 2016

The Transport Guy: Jawbone has stopped producing its fitness trackers and sold the remaining inventory to a third party

Steve Kovach May 27, 2016 at 01:13PM

JawboneUP4

Jawbone has stopped making its UP fitness trackers and sold its remaining inventory to a third-party reseller, sources familiar with the matter told Tech Insider.

Jawbone has three major fitness trackers: The UP2, UP3, and UP4. The company has struggled to sell the devices and was forced to offload them at a discount to a reseller in order to get the revenue it needed to keep the business going, according to the source.

It's unclear if Jawbone will start making the UP trackers again. Representatives for Jawbone did not return a request for comment.

It's been over a year since Jawbone has released a new flagship fitness tracker. Despite entering the wearables market almost five years ago, Jawbone has failed to gain any significant market share in the space. FitBit and Apple currently dominate.

Jawbone raised a new $165 million round of funding in January. The company's CEO Hosain Rahman told Tech Insider a few months ago that the company plans to use that money to develop clinical-grade fitness trackers.

Sources also said Jawbone has discontinued its Bluetooth speaker business and is trying to sell its remaining inventory. On Friday, Fortune's Leena Rao reported that Jawbone wants to sell off its speaker business. Rahman declined to comment on the speaker business when Tech Insider asked about it a few weeks ago while reporting on another story.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: We asked an astronaut if aliens exist — and his answer was spot on

Jawbone has stopped producing its fitness trackers and sold the remaining inventory to a third party from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

The Transport Guy: Apple is working on an AI system that wipes the floor with Google and everyone else

Steve Kovach May 27, 2016 at 11:47AM

cookie monster apple siri commercial

Siri is due for a big upgrade.

Apple now has the tech in place to give its digital assistant a big boost thanks to a UK-based company called VocalIQ it bought last year.

According to a source familiar with VocalIQ’s product, it’s much more robust and capable than Siri’s biggest competitors like Google Now, Amazon’s Alexa, and Microsoft’s Cortana. In fact, it was so impressive that Apple bought VocalIQ before the company could finish and release its smartphone app. After the acquisition, Apple kept most of the VocalIQ team and let them work out of their Cambridge office and integrate the product into Siri.

Before Apple bought the company, VocalIQ tested its product against Siri, Google Now, and Cortana, and the results were impressive. Users asked each AI questions using normal language, not the robotic commands you’re used to using with digital assistants. Those commands can be long and complicated, and the other assistants had trouble catching everything.

For example, imagine asking a computer to “Find a nearby Chinese restaurant with open parking and WiFi that’s kid-friendly.” That’d trip up most assistants, but VocalIQ could handle it. The result? VocalIQ’s success rate was over 90%, while Google Now, Siri, and Cortana were only successful about 20% of the time, according to one source.

How VocalIQ works

After writing the program, VocalIQ hired contractors through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk to feed the program queries normal humans would ask and help it learn how people talk. These contractors would ask VocalIQ questions from a list of prompts to train the system. After about 3,000 dialogues, VocalIQ already started to get much more accurate. Once the process was finished, VocalIQ had recorded about 10,000 dialogues from Mechanical Turk contractors.

To put that in context, Siri brings in 1 billion queries per week from users to help it get better. But VocalIQ was able to learn with just a few thousand queries and still beat Siri.

phil schiller introduces Siri

VocalIQ may sound similar to Hound, a new digital assistant app that launched on iPhone and Android recently, but Hound only works one session at a time. VocalIQ remembers context forever, just like a human can. That’s a massive breakthrough.

Let’s go back to the Chinese restaurant example. What if you change your mind an hour later? Simply saying something like “Find me a Mexican restaurant instead,” will bring you new results, while still taking into account the other parameters like parking and WiFi you mentioned before. Hound, Siri, and any other assistant would make you start the search session over again. But Vocal IQ remembers. That’s more human-like than anything available today.

Because VocalIQ understands context so well, it essentially eliminates the need to look at a screen for confirmation that it’s doing what you want it to do. That’s useful on the phone, but could be even better for other ambitious projects like the car or smart speaker system Apple is reportedly building. (VocalIQ was being pitched as a voice-controlled AI platform for cars before Apple bought the company.) In fact, VocalIQ only considers itself a success when the user is able to complete a task without looking at a screen. Siri, Google Now, and Cortana often ask you to confirm tasks by tapping on the screen.

It acts like a real assistant, not just voice search

VocalIQ’s platform is also malleable enough to be programmed for anything you want to do. One example a source gave was teaching it to successfully manage email while a user’s phone was in their pocket. (Just like Joaquin Phoenix's character controls his phone in the movie "Her.") In theory, Apple would be able to train Siri to do everything much better using VocalIQ.

VocalIQ can also filter out extraneous noise to figure out exactly what you’re saying, thus making it more accurate than Siri is today. It’s able to take in all the noise in an environment — the TV, kids shouting, whatever — and determine with a high probability which sound is actually the user’s query. It can even learn to adapt to different accents over time to improve accuracy. If you’ve ever had trouble getting Siri to understand you, then you know how important this is.

amazon echo

It’s still unclear when Apple plans to implement more of VocalIQ’s capabilities into Siri. One source speculated that it may happen slowly over time, so as not to throw off users with a radical change. But it sounds like Apple is arming itself for a significant shift in how Siri works.

Apple declined to comment.

Meanwhile, Siri is about to get some other improvements this year. According to Amir Efrati of The Information, Apple will open up Siri to developers, similar to the way Amazon has opened up its Alexa assistant. That means third-party apps will let you start using your voice for some tasks. (“Siri, call me an Uber,” for example.)

Recently, there have been doubts about Apple’s artificial intelligence efforts. At its big annual conference in May, Google showed off some intriguing new uses for its AI, including Google Home, a smart speaker with its digital assistant built inside. Marco Arment, a well-known developer and big voice in the tech community, wrote on his blog that if Apple fails to keep up with AI and voice-powered platforms take off, the company risks suffering the same fate as BlackBerry.

But it sounds like Apple isn’t sitting still while its competitors go all in.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is Google’s answer to the Amazon Echo

Apple is working on an AI system that wipes the floor with Google and everyone else from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

Thursday, May 26, 2016

The Transport Guy: Here’s the real problem with Android

Steve Kovach May 26, 2016 at 09:54AM

Android

I rarely recommend buying an Android phone over an iPhone.

It's not because the phones are bad. There are plenty great Android phones out there, especially Samsung's Galaxy S7 Edge, my favorite of the bunch.

My big problem with Android is apparently the same one Google has, as Bloomberg reported this week: Android phone makers are horrible at keeping their devices up to date.

It's gotten so bad that Google has threatened to shame its Android partners by releasing a list of which ones have failed to issue critical updates to their devices to the public.

This is when Android fans like to shout at me, saying none of this matters. Google does a great job at keeping its suite of apps like Gmail, Google Calendar, and Google Now up to date, they say. Older versions of Android work just fine.

But those arguments fall flat when Android phone makers don't update phones that have been exposed to nasty bugs like Stagefright, which made about 1 billion Android devices vulnerable to hackers. They fall flat when the only way to enjoy cool new Android features is to buy a new phone instead of waiting for a software update that'll never come. They fall flat when developers delay their apps because they're too busy programming for all the fragmented versions of Android in use. And so on.

Today, only 7.5% of Android devices are running Marshmallow, the latest version of Android that came out over six months ago. Compare that to the latest version of iOS, iOS 9, which is on 84% of devices. That's the real strength of the iPhone. iOS is the best platform for timely updates across all devices, which means your iPhone is always as secure as it can be and developers are incentivized to give you the latest and greatest apps. It's why the iPhone always wins.

The only way to ensure you get timely Android updates is to buy one of Google's Nexus phones. They're amazing devices, but they only represent a tiny fraction of the Android phones in existence. Walk into any store, and you'll find anything but a Nexus phone.

It's understandable that Google is frustrated its partners still can't provide timely updates, but this problem is Google's own doing. By giving Android away for free and letting any phone maker modify it, Google sacrificed a unified, stable ecosystem so it could steal the smartphone market away from Apple. That was good for Google in the beginning, but bad for you, the user. Now it sounds like Google is having second thoughts about its decision.

There's almost no chance this problem will go away. Google could start formally licensing Android to phone companies, but that would just make them angry and go hunting for another platform. It could also start building more phones on its own, but then it would end up competing even more with its own partners.

Google is stuck in an impossible situation. And, if you use an Android phone, so are you.

SEE ALSO: Google will pay you $100,000 if you can hack a Chromebook

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is Google’s answer to the Amazon Echo

Here’s the real problem with Android from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

Wednesday, May 25, 2016

The Transport Guy: Apple has a huge decision to make about naming the iPhone (AAPL)

Steve Kovach May 25, 2016 at 10:25AM

iPhone 6

Apple might have to rethink how it names the iPhone.

For years, the company has been on a "tick-tock" schedule with each new iPhone release. Every other year you get a new design. The following year, you get the same design with some internal improvements and new software features. (Think iPhone 4, then 4s. iPhone 5, then 5s. iPhone 6, then 6s.)

This year we're on the "tick" cycle, so you'd expect Apple to call the next iPhone coming in September the iPhone 7. But the earliest rumors point to a fundamental, radical change for what should be the "tock" cycle in 2017, including a new design with a front that's just a giant display, better screen technology, and wireless charging.

If that's true, the phone that should be called the iPhone 7s won't look anything like this year's "iPhone 7." And that means Apple may have to rethink how it names its iPhones.

It sounds like Apple wants to go big for the iPhone's tenth birthday next year. That means a shift in the tick-tock design and naming cycle with a fresh, new iPhone. This year may be the year of the iPhone 7, but Apple could possibly skip ahead to the iPhone 8 in 2017. If it were up to me, I'd kill off the numbering altogether. The iPhone 7 will actually be the tenth model of the iPhone, after all. Confusing!

iphone 7 leakThen again, the tech world is horrible at naming things. Microsoft jumped from Windows 8 to Windows 10. Samsung is thinking about jumping from the Galaxy Note 5 to the Galaxy Note 7. The "Grand Theft Auto" series is all out of whack. You get the idea. 

It'd be better to keep things simple: iPhone SE, iPhone, and iPhone Plus.

SEE ALSO: Apple CEO Tim Cook looked at a 346-year-old painting and saw an iPhone

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 7 tricks buried in your iPhone that only power users know about

Apple has a huge decision to make about naming the iPhone (AAPL) from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

Tuesday, May 24, 2016

The Transport Guy: Apple is about to build the perfect laptop (AAPL)

Steve Kovach May 24, 2016 at 09:44AM

new macbook gold color

For years, I've been dying for a big upgrade to the MacBook Air.

While I still think the Air is the best overall laptop you can buy, it could be so much better. Its design hasn't changed significantly since 2010, and it still lacks the sharp Retina display found on every other Apple gadget.

But after all these years, it doesn't seem likely MacBook Air fans like me will get what their wish.

Instead, Apple is getting ready to radically redesign the MacBook Pro this fall, according to Ming-Chi Kuo, an analyst with an excellent track record of predicting what Apple is working on. Kuo says the new MacBook will take design cues from the ultra-thin MacBook and have a secondary touchscreen for function keys and a fingerprint sensor.

That means we're at the beginning of a significant shift in the MacBook lineup, and the new MacBook Pro will soon take over as the best laptop you can buy, finally fulfilling everything Air users like me have wanted for years.

Here's what I think will happen:

The MacBook Air will stick around for now as the entry-level MacBook, starting at $899. I doubt we'll see a major refresh to the Air ever again. It may get some internal improvements, but that'll be it until it's totally phased out.

MacBook AirThe MacBook may be underpowered by today's standards, but it'll become Apple's flagship laptop once it can match the Air's specs in a couple more years. After that, say goodbye to the Air. Hopefully, Apple will be able to get the MacBook's price down to $999 or less by then.

In the near term, the next MacBook Pro will end up being the perfect computer a lot of my fellow MacBook Air owners will end up buying. After all these years, the Air feels ancient compared to Apple's sleek MacBooks with a sharp screen. The new Pro will be the only model that'll have plenty of power plus a modern design.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's the solution to the most annoying thing about the MacBook

Apple is about to build the perfect laptop (AAPL) from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

Monday, May 23, 2016

The Transport Guy: Here's what everyone got wrong about the latest doomsday scenario for Apple

Steve Kovach May 23, 2016 at 02:45PM

Zooey Deschanel Siri iPhone

The tech world was in a frenzy this weekend, arguing over whether or not Apple would collapse if it failed to catch onto the budding trend of artificial intelligence, which some think could be the next major computing platform after the smartphone.

Marco Arment, a well-respected developer and observer of the tech industry, wrote a post on his Friday highlighting how Apple appears to be behind on AI compared to its biggest competitors like Facebook, Amazon, and especially Google, which showed off some interesting AI-powered gadgets and apps at the I/O developers conference last week. (Arment left out Microsoft, but I'd say it's wrong to exclude it. Microsoft is doing a lot of cool stuff with machine learning and AI too, racist chatbots excluded, of course.)

The argument goes that if AI turns out to be a major platform and we end up communicating with our gadgets through voice more than tapping and touching, then Apple could be in big trouble and suffer a similar fate as BlackBerry did when it failed to adapt to modern touchscreen smartphones.

Here's Arment:

Where Apple suffers is big-data services and AI, such as search, relevance, classification, and complex natural-language queries. Apple can do rudimentary versions of all of those, but their competitors — again, especially Google — are far ahead of them, and the gap is only widening.

That's totally true today.

Apple may have been the first to popularize the concept of a digital assistant when it brought Siri to the iPhone 4s in 2011, but Google was able to surpass Siri less than a year later with its own digital assistant, Google Now. At I/O last week, we learned Google Now is evolving into Google Assistant, and will become even more useful, potentially leaving Apple in the dust.

Google Home

Things may look bad for Apple's AI efforts today, but it's naive to think the company is sitting idly by while Amazon and Google put their digital assistants in home speakers and give us a taste of a world where we a lot of our computing is done through voice.

In recent months, Apple has snapped up two impressive companies working on artificial intelligence. Even though Apple hasn't said how they'll use those new technologies, it doesn't take a genius to see how they'll fit in.

Let's take a look:

VocalIQ

In October of last year, Apple bought a company called VocalIQ, which has a technology that helps digital assistants learn every time it interacts with a person's voice commands. 

Here's how VocalIQ described its product on its website:

Every time your application is used it gets a little bit smarter. Previous conversations are central to [its] learning process — allowing the system to better understand future requests and in turn, react more intelligently. As a developer, you have the ability to change your system’s interpretation or behavior directly in your app.

Now imagine Siri having the power to learn the more people use it. Over time, it can provide better answers for what you're looking for and understand context a lot better.

Perceptio

Around the same time Apple bought VocalIQ, it also bought Perceptio, a startup that made it possible to power AI assistants without having to mine a user's personal data.

This has a huge benefit for Apple, which unlike Google and Facebook, doesn't collect data on its users. Part of the reason why Google Now is so good is because it mines data from your search history, Gmail, calendar, and more to figure out what you want to do.

Apple's history of keeping that kind of data private may be great for your own peace of mind, but it also means Apple's AI services suffer. If Perceptio works as well as it sounds on paper, this could be a way for Apple to balance a user's privacy while still providing them with an excellent AI assistant.

Too late?

As many have said already, it could be too late for Apple to essentially buy its way into AI, assuming the platform ever takes off.

I don't think so. There's massive potential in voice-powered assistants, but so far none of them have become useful and ubiquitous enough to pull people away from their smartphones. Apple doesn't have to be better than Google, Microsoft, or Amazon at AI. It's so far ahead of them in everything else that it just has to match them by baking great AI into the iPhone and other future products.

If AI does take off, it appears Apple is building up its technology to keep up.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This is Google’s answer to the Amazon Echo

Here's what everyone got wrong about the latest doomsday scenario for Apple from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

The Transport Guy: Here's why Google's Chromebooks are so awesome (GOOG, GOOGL)

Steve Kovach May 23, 2016 at 10:18AM

google chromebook pixel

Google's Chromebooks just hit a huge milestone. For the first time, they outsold Macs in the US, a sign that a lot of people are looking for cheap, capable computers.

And soon, they're getting a huge update that'll let them run Android apps.

Here's why Chromebooks are so great, and why you'll probably want to buy one soon.

They're cheap.

You can get a really great Chromebook for around $200, or about one-fifth the cost of a 13-inch MacBook Air. Don't let the price fool you though. Just because Chromebooks are cheap doesn't mean they're bad. All the major computer brands like HP, Asus, and Samsung make excellent Chromebooks.

However, Google's own Chromebook Pixel, which has a sharp touchscreen and beautiful design, costs over $1,000. It's nice, but you probably don't need to spend that much to get the full Chromebook experience.



They're versatile.

Chromebooks come in all shapes and sizes, so you can find the right form factor to fit your needs. For example, some models, like the Asus Chromebook Flip (pictured here), have touchscreens and can fold over into a "tablet mode."

You can also get Chromebooks with any screen size, ranging from 10-inchers to 15-inchers.



They're perfect if you use Google services.

If you use Google's services for email, chatting, calendar, cloud storage, or anything else, the Chromebook is a great computer for you.

The Chromebook's operating system is a modified version of the Chrome web browser, which means it uses Google apps for all the standard stuff you want to do. Just sign into your Google account once and you're good to go.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Here's why Google's Chromebooks are so awesome (GOOG, GOOGL) from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

Sunday, May 22, 2016

The Transport Guy: Chromebooks are about to take over and Apple and Microsoft should be worried

Steve Kovach May 22, 2016 at 09:30AM

Asus Chromebook Flip

Chromebooks are about to take over the world.

A few days ago, Google announced that Chromebooks will soon be able to run Android apps from the Google Play app store, finally making them fully capable computers and putting them in a position to put a real dent in Apple and Microsoft's dominance in PCs.

The announcement was perfectly timed too. Chromebooks outsold Macs in the US for the first time last quarter, according to research firm IDC, which tracks PC sales. It's a sign that a growing number of PC users are realizing they don't need to spend a thousand bucks or more on a laptop, especially when they're buying a new smartphone every other year.

Right now, Chromebooks are essentially just the Chrome web browser running on a laptop. While they have some offline capabilities, you're still mostly limited to what's possible on the web, which is fine for a lot of tasks, but not ideal when you want to work offline or use certain programs.

Android apps mean a lot for Chromebooks. It's not just about playing Candy Crush; it opens up a whole new suite of apps to Chromebook users for the first time like Microsoft Office, Photoshop, and better, more capable versions of web apps like Slack or Spotify. Plus, all those apps can run in individual windows like on a traditional PC. Most people probably won't even realize they're using an app originally designed for a phone.

 

When Chromebooks first launched, it was is easy to scoff at them. (I did.) Who wants a shell of a computer that's just running a web browser? But we quickly learned that cheap computers that are just capable enough can draw in a lot of buyers. The success of Chromebooks, especially in areas like education, was a shock to everyone.

Now they're poised to eat into the PC market even more. Soon, there won't be anything you can't do on a Chromebook that you can do on a Mac or Windows PC. And, in a lot of cases, you'll be able to do it for hundreds less. You can get a decent Chromebook for just $200.

That should worry Apple and Microsoft. Ever since the modern smartphone era, there's been fewer reasons to upgrade to a new PC as often as you used to. And when many people are ready, they go as cheap as possible. Access to Android apps will quell any doubts about what a Chromebook can do, and I bet we're about to go through a fundamental shift in the way a lot of people use PCs because of it.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Chrome has a ton of hidden features — here’s how to find and enable them

Chromebooks are about to take over and Apple and Microsoft should be worried from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

Thursday, May 19, 2016

The Transport Guy: Google is out of original ideas (GOOG, GOOGL)

Steve Kovach May 19, 2016 at 10:41AM

sundar pichai google io 2016

Google kicked off I/O, its biggest event of the year, on Wednesday.

And yet, not a single product announced was new.

At I/O, we saw Google chasing the trends of the moment instead of leaving us with the feeling that it has anything original left in the works that aren't just Google-fied versions of what we've seen before from its rivals.

(To be clear, I'm just talking about Google, not its parent company Alphabet, which is working on crazy projects ranging from internet-spewing drones to ways to cheat death.)

First there's Google Home, a smart WiFi speaker launching later this year that has Google's new virtual assistant living inside. It responds to voice commands and can do everything from telling you your flight is delayed to playing your favorite music.

google home

Sound familiar? That's because it's exactly the same as Amazon's Echo, the smart speaker that has turned into a unexpected hit for the company.

Then there's Allo, a messaging app infused with Google's intelligence that can guess what you want to type next and suggest things to do when you're chatting. 

It's the same stuff we're seeing in Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, Telegram, and the slew of other messaging apps out there clinging to the idea that people want to send texts to a virtual helper to buy flowers and book tickets. (They don't.) Allo looks fine, but good luck getting hundreds of millions of people already locked into other messaging platforms to switch over.

Next, there's Duo, a video chat app, which inexplicably competes with Google's other video chat app, Hangouts, on top of Microsoft's Skype and Apple's FaceTime.

Finally, we saw Daydream, the new virtual reality platform built into Android, with the hopes that people will build headsets that you can slot your smartphone into. Its interface and overall concept is almost a direct copy of Samsung and Oculus' Gear VR.

Here's Gear VR's main menu:

gear vr home screen

And here's Daydream's:

Google Daydream

Everything Google showed us this week is an iteration on something one of its competitors has already done, but with the promise it can do it better. And that's assuming the products even make it past the initial "oooo and ahhhhh" phase that has the tech press whipped into a frenzy this week.

google nexus QAfter all, Google has a history of announcing flashy projects at I/O that either never launched or totally bombed, like Google Glass, Google TV, and the Nexus Q media streaming orb. All of those appeared to be pretty cool when they were first unveiled... until people actually tried to use them.

Two CNET writers got to talk to Google CEO Sundar Pichai ahead of I/O and asked why Google's new products appear to be following the competition, not leading it.

His answer was the one we often hear from tech executives: From the outside, it may appear like Google is chasing its competitors' ideas, but it's all fueled by the belief that Google has a superior product. Pichai rightfully pointed to web search, web browsing, and email as all areas that existed before Google got involved and perfected them.

But the only project Pichai's optimism could apply to is Google Home. Assuming the speaker sounds good and the microphones are just as accurate as the ones on the Echo, Google Home has an immediate advantage over Amazon thanks to Google Assistant, the next iteration of the already excellent Google Now.

Google Now has bested Siri since it first debuted four years ago, and no one has beaten it simply because it's so good at mining all the data Google already has on you from your search history to Amazon package deliveries. Putting Google Assistant in a can inside your home sounds like a fantastic idea, and it's going to be tough for Amazon to match it.

As for everything else? 

It's just Google chasing stuff the rest of the industry already invented.

SEE ALSO: Here are the most exciting things Google announced at its giant conference

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Google just launched a video calling app that does something FaceTime can't

Google is out of original ideas (GOOG, GOOGL) from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

Tuesday, May 17, 2016

The Transport Guy: The iPhone 7 is going to be boring and you'll have to wait until 2017 for something special (AAPL)

Steve Kovach May 17, 2016 at 12:48PM

Tim Cook

The iPhone 7 is going to be boring.

If early leaks are to be believed — and they're too numerous and too consistent to not believe a lot of what's floating around out there — then this year's iPhone 7 won't be a major departure from last year's iPhone 6S.

It'll look mostly the same except for the antenna lines on the back. There'll be a powerful camera, possibly with dual lenses, which could help you shoot DSLR-like photos.

The biggest change will be the removal of the headphone jack, which already has Apple fans preemptively defending the decision to ditch a feature that's been standard for decades. The rest of the world will hyperventilate for a month or two before realizing that — nope! — it doesn't matter if there's no headphone jack.

So unless something crazy happens in the next few months, the iPhone 7 will look and feel a lot like the 6S.

iphone 7 leak

Is that enough to get you excited? Is it enough to turn around the slump in iPhone sales and convince people to upgrade their 6 or 6S?

I doubt it.

If anything, we're in a period similar to the one we saw in 2012 and 2013 after Apple introduced the iPhone 5 and 5S and the world seemed enamored with Samsung's big-screen phones.

Apple finally delivered on the big screen with the iPhone 6, prompting a massive upgrade cycle in 2014 and 2015. Now things have calmed down, and the company is scrambling to find compelling reasons to get people to upgrade more often.

That might not happen until 2017, which is when Apple appears to be gearing up for a radical new iPhone.

Here's the scuttlebutt on the 2017 iPhone

Most importantly, it sounds like the 2017 iPhone will have a new design. Daring Fireball's John Gruber, who's pretty plugged in to what Apple is working on, mentioned on his podcast the other day that he's heard rumors Apple is preparing to launch an iPhone that removes all bezels from the front.

That means the iPhone will look like one giant screen without a home button. Meanwhile, accurate Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo predicts that the device will also be made almost entirely of glass, similar to the iPhone 4.

Next year will mark the iPhone's 10th birthday, so what better way to celebrate than with a complete overhaul?

iphone 7 concept

In addition to the new design, there are some smaller but significant updates in the works.

Bloomberg reported in January that next year's iPhone will have wireless charging. Even though that is nothing new, the technology charges your device a lot slower than wired charging and it has to be placed directly on top of a special charging pad.

The Bloomberg report says that Apple has figured out a way to wirelessly charge devices from farther away than current wireless-charging docks. That could be why the company has hired a bunch of wireless-charging experts recently, as The Verge's Ben Popper noticed this week.

The screen will get a big improvement, too. As Kuo also reported, Apple will start using organic light-emitting diode displays, which are more power-efficient and do a better job at representing colors. Samsung has used OLED technology for years, and it's one of the key reasons why its displays are always better than Apple's.

My colleague, Antonio Villas-Boas, has a good breakdown showing the benefits of OLED displays right here.

In the meantime, the iPhone will be just fine. Even if the iPhone 7 doesn't appear exciting on the outside, it'll still have the one key advantage that has always kept it at the top: iOS and its ecosystem of apps and services that keep users locked in.

SEE ALSO: This rumored iPhone 7 leak is the most detailed yet

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Everything we know about the iPhone 7

The iPhone 7 is going to be boring and you'll have to wait until 2017 for something special (AAPL) from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

The Transport Guy: Here's a video of Tim Cook playing a GarageBand duet with a famous Taiwanese pop star

Steve Kovach May 17, 2016 at 06:37AM

Apple CEO Tim Cook is on a tour of Asia this week.

In addition to taking $1 billion taxi rides, he's promoting a new change to the GarageBand music app.

GarageBand was updated Monday with a bunch of Chinese instruments and local Chinese languages.

Here's a video of Cook doing a demo of the new app with pop star JJ Lin. It's adorkable.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Apple just invested $1 billion in this Chinese company

Here's a video of Tim Cook playing a GarageBand duet with a famous Taiwanese pop star from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

Monday, May 16, 2016

The Transport Guy: Everyone in my Twitter feed is talking about how Twitter won't count photos and links against the character limit

Steve Kovach May 16, 2016 at 12:43PM

shrek twitter bird exploding

Twitter will stop counting links and images against its traditional 140-character limit, according to a new report from Bloomberg's Sarah Frier. It should be happening soon.

It's all my Twitter feed has been able to talk about since the news broke.

This is a great news for Twitter users!

Unfortunately, my entire Twitter feed is full of journalists, techies, and coastal elites who are already addicted to the service. Those aren't the people Twitter needs to please in order to turn things around and take on the Snapchats and Instagrams and other social networks that have the rest of the world's attention.

But hey, at least it'll be easier for people to tweet about using Twitter now.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A college student declared her love on Snapchat and captivated the whole campus

Everyone in my Twitter feed is talking about how Twitter won't count photos and links against the character limit from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

The Transport Guy: Jawbone has been promising a breakthrough fitness tracker for years: insiders reveal why it keeps falling short

Steve Kovach May 16, 2016 at 10:25AM

Jawbone mini jambox ads by juergen teller

In 2013, famed fashion photographer Juergen Teller snapped a bunch of models partying on a Greek island. His photos showed them sipping wine on a sailboat, skinny dipping, and taking bubble baths in a marble tub.

This was not a campaign for perfume or designer clothes. Instead, it was for the $180 Jambox Mini, a new product from San Francisco tech company Jawbone, which paid a rumored $500,000 for the shoot. The campaign was timed to launch during New York Fashion Week.

But some employees at Jawbone weren’t feeling it. In addition to the Jambox, Jawbone was getting ready to release a new UP fitness tracker, which would eventually be the primary focus of the company. The concern stemmed from what seemed like mixed messaging: One product was marketed with a bunch of models drinking and partying, while the other product was supposed to help you live a healthy lifestyle. The two just didn’t jive.

At an all-hands meeting, one employee voiced those concerns to Hosain Rahman, Jawbone’s founder and CEO.

Rahman got upset with the criticism and strongly rejected the idea that the ads were promoting "unhealthy eating habits or drug abuse," as the employee had suggested claimed. 

“He totally lost it,” one person who was there told Tech Insider.

Rahman later apologized for the outburst in an email to employees and agreed to look into some of the concerns, but he continued to defend the campaign. "Over tens of thousands of photos were shot for this ad campaign and I was personally involved in the weeding out of photos that were not in line with the image Jawbone seeks to convey," he wrote. 

It was a brief but telling conflict. Jawbone was at the time trying to create two breakthrough products at once, and a series of missteps had led some employees to doubt whether it could follow through on either. In subsequent years, things have only gotten worse, as the company de-emphasized the Jambox and has still failed to release a fitness tracker that lives up to its own hype.

What's going wrong at Jawbone?

Current and former employees at the company told Tech Insider stories about executives wrapped up in the lofty goal of finding the next big tech gadget, while refusing to remain grounded in the reality.

The company, which has raised around $1 billion, got another lifeline in January, with $165 million in funding — which Rahman told Tech Insider shows that investors think company is onto something big. But now, as the wearables market turns suddenly gloomy, Jawbone may have one last chance to follow through on the fitness tracker it's been promising for years.

Hosain Rahman Jawbone

“Everyone is frustrated when you’re not shipping”

Jawbone, which made its name selling Bluetooth headsets in the late 90s and early 2000s, entered the wearables market in 2011 with an ambitious vision: a fitness tracker that you almost never take off.

Rahman told Techcrunch at the time: “It seems like a big departure, but once we start talking about the things it takes to make this whole category work, we get into things like making it tiny, having a long battery life, making it fashionable, making it waterproof, working with smartphones, having a rich, visual experience on your smartphone and making it social.”

The original UP fitness band was the first device to market that was supposed to deliver that promise.

But Jawbone quickly ran into problems. The UP band had to be removed from store shelves in 2011 because of reports it would “brick” and stop functioning after a few days of use. Gizmodo called out Jawbone for “knowingly selling defective products” in a review for what otherwise would’ve been a groundbreaking gadget. Eventually, Jawbone identified the problem and did the right thing: It stopped selling the UP and offered full refunds to anyone who bought one.

Jawbone released a new version of the UP in 2012. Reveiwers loved the design and extra-long battery life, but they complained that it couldn’t sync with phones wirelessly like competing trackers from FitBit and Nike.

The company included wireless syncing with the UP24, released in late 2013, but it was still missing key features like waterproofing that Rahman was pitching three years earlier.

That was poised to change with another product on the horizon: the UP3. Announced in the fall of 2014, the new fitness tracker was scheduled to launch in time for the holidays. A press push drew in pre-orders and promised Jawbone’s new product would be completely waterproof. Not even market leader FitBit had pulled that off.

But shortly after the UP3 was announced, Jawbone issued a product delay, citing problems with the device’s waterproofing feature.

JawboneUP33

Rahman blamed Jawbone’s manufacturing partner in China for problems with the UP3’s waterproof testing. The initial results from China showed that early versions of the UP3 were completely waterproof, Rahman told Tech Insider, which is why he says Jawbone initially ran with that messaging. But he says it soon became clear that the final iteration of the UP3 didn’t meet the waterproofing spec.

Rahman boarded a plane to China on Thanksgiving night to find out what went wrong with the testing.

“I was like, ‘Oh my God.’ The testing that they were doing was not up to par,” Rahman said of the trip.

Employees who were working on the UP3 say they spent the months between the original UP3 announcement and the product’s actual spring release trying to convince head of product Travis Bogard and Rahman that waterproofing the device was nearly impossible. Instead, they say they urged the executives to consider changing the spec to “splash proof” and get the product out in time for the 2014 holiday cycle.

The sources say Rahman and Jawbone’s SVP of operations, Richard Drysdale, were convinced they could get waterproofing to work. This stubbornness frustrated some employees, but those who questioned the strategy never felt their concerns were taken seriously.

“Their point of view had no value,” one former employee told Tech Insider.

Bogard pushed back on the notion that executives were purposefully delaying the UP3 in order to make it fully waterproof.

“There was a minimum threshold we needed to achieve,” Bogard said in an interview with Tech Insider. “We also believed it needed to still be splash- and water-resistant and in some cases it wasn’t even that. We can’t ship something if we don’t understand the dimensions of it.”

Either way, Jawbone missed the important holiday sales season and nobody was pleased.

“Everyone is frustrated when you’re not shipping,” Rahman said.

In April 2015, Jawbone finally launched the UP3. Confusingly, Jawbone also launched a new flagship wearable, the UP4, at the same time. Both devices were only “splash-proof” and missing features at launch, like respiration, perspiration, and passive heart rate monitoring. The sensors for those features were included on the UP3 and UP4, but they would have to be unlocked with a software update later.

Why so many problems?

Several former Jawbone employees described a chaotic product testing environment, where devices were being fixed and tweaked practically up to the date of their launches. The constant changes made it difficult to plan marketing or retail partnerships for the new devices; no one could land on a clear concept of what they were supposed to do. Others said it was difficult to push ideas for new features through to upper management.

“It discouraged the employees,” one person who worked at Jawbone said. “We couldn’t make things happen because they would just say ‘Yeah, we’ll put it on the roadmap.’”

Bogard, the product head, blamed the testing hiccups on the fact that Jawbone was attempting to do something that had never been done before. Jawbone’s ambitious goal, he explained, was to make a consumer tech gadget that was worn 24/7 and could withstand day-to-day wear and tear.

Bogard also said employees were often testing early versions of the products that were at least a generation behind what was being produced in China, so the bugs they reported were often ironed out by the time the next version arrived.

Rahman and Bogard both told Tech Insider that they had learned a lot from past mistakes, and that they were confident the company would avoid them in the future.

Falling behind

During all of these product hiccups, Jawbone’s biggest competitor, FitBit, started running away with the fitness wearables category. FitBit was able to snap up as much as 34% of the wearables market by 2015, according to research firm IDC, while Jawbone only took 4.4%. FitBit would eventually go on to have a very successful IPO. In the latest market share report from IDC, Jawbone doesn't even rank among its rivals in wearable technology.

Jawbone employees who witnessed Fitbit’s rise say Rahman ignored the competition and always claimed something bigger and better from Jawbone was on the horizon.

“There was a sense of dismissiveness [about FitBit],” one former employee said.

Rahman admits it bothered Jawbone employees to watch FitBit’s rise, but he says he wasn’t indifferent towards what his competitor was doing. He believed FitBit had an inferior product and didn’t want to put out one with similar features if Jawbone couldn’t accurately track what it wanted to.

For example, Rahman says FitBit went to market with a product that couldn’t accurately measure heart rate. Jawbone could have done the same, but Rahman wanted to wait for the technology to mature first.

“We made a decision, and I stand by that, to not launch something that’s not going to be accurate,” Rahman said. “I think that ultimately in this category that will be the thing that wins.”

After the messy UP3 launch, Jawbone needed a recalibration. In May 2015, it made a flashy hire. Sameer Samat, one of Google’s VPs in charge of commerce, was brought on to help Rahman run the company day to day and make everything run smoothly.

Under Samat, Jawbone went through a hiring freeze and layoffs to streamline the company’s structure. The company was gearing up for a relaunch of sorts for the UP3 and UP4 for the 2015 holiday season. The plan was to pitch the products as fully capable, finally unlocking all those dormant sensors on the wristbands.

“There was a collective sigh of relief when he came on,” one person who worked with Samat at Jawbone told Tech Insider. “It was clear he was going to make the hard decisions necessary in order to straighten out this company. He was very clear in his explanations … People rallied.”

Jawbone’s products did make some progress under Samat. For example, Jawbone was able to unlock new features in the UP3 and UP4 like automatic sleep tracking and passive heart monitoring through software updates. It also launched a redesigned version of the UP2 fitness tracker with a more stylish clasp.

But that was about it. There were still sensors in the UP bands for measuring respiration, perspiration, and more that hadn’t been unlocked through software updates. Rahman said he hired Samat to sort through the potential capabilities of the UP bands and decide which ones the software team could help execute. Yet Samat wasn’t around long enough to fully realize those ambitions.

The planned holiday 2015 relaunch never happened, and Samat was out of the company a few months later, lured back to Google with what sources say was a multimillion-dollar package and the promise to possibly run the Google Play store.

The glitches and delays ended up being costly for Jawbone. They caused the company to go through two crucial holiday seasons in a row — 2014 and 2015 — without any major new products. Jawbone was forced to rely on venture capital funding to keep moving as opposed to revenue generated from product sales.

The next big thing?

Now it’s crunch time.

With its new round of funding, there’s more pressure than ever for Jawbone to turn things around and create the breakthrough wearable it has been promising for years. For obvious reasons, Rahman couldn’t talk about future products, but he pointed to the fact that Jawbone’s investors have seen what’s coming and were impressed enough to whip out their checkbooks and give the company a $165 million cushion.

Without getting into specifics, Rahman teased that Jawbone is uniquely capable of making wearables useful and exciting again by including medical-grade health monitoring, which he says will be a key differentiator over other products.

“I think there’s going to be a convergence towards medical-grade signals that are telling people real things about themselves,” Rahman said. “I think there’s a consumerization of that kind of medical-grade thing happening.”

JawboneUP4

Rahman also said Jawbone spent over three times as much as FitBit did on research and development, which he believes will set Jawbone up for future success.

“We’re one of two companies in the space that has a chief medical officer,” Rahman said. (The other is Apple, which is also said to be thinking about clinical-grade sensors in future versions of the Apple Watch.)

Not everyone shares Rahman’s optimism for Jawbone’s future, however. One person familiar with the business called the $165 million round a “survival package” and said there was little chance Jawbone could pull off a “miracle” before running out of money.

Another headache Jawbone will have to face is its legal battle with FitBit. The two companies went to court on May 9 over a trade secrets dispute.

Jawbone alleges that FitBit poached employees from Jawbone and stole its intellectual property. If Jawbone gets its way, FitBit might be banned from importing its products into the US from its overseas manufacturing facilities, which could give Jawbone an immediate advantage.

But that doesn’t seem likely to happen. On April 29, the court ruled that it won’t look at any of Jawbone’s patents that were originally part of the dispute, greatly diminishing the chances that FitBit’s products will face an import ban. Even if Jawbone wins the case, it’ll have to deal with a lengthy appeals process from FitBit before any FitBit products are banned, according to one person familiar with the case. In a statement, a Jawbone spokesperson said the two patents that were thrown out "represent only a portion of Jawbone's case against FitBit" and planned to appeal the ruling.

Either way, this will be a pivotal year for Jawbone. Its best shot is to do something it has repeatedly struggled with over the years: Come up with a hit product that works.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here’s why your jeans have that tiny front pocket

Jawbone has been promising a breakthrough fitness tracker for years: insiders reveal why it keeps falling short from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

Saturday, May 14, 2016

The Transport Guy: The best desktop calendar app used to be free, but now Microsoft is making you pay $150 for it

Steve Kovach May 14, 2016 at 06:09AM

family sunrise silhouette beach

In a few short months, Microsoft will officially kill my favorite calendar app, Sunrise.

For Sunrise fans like me, that's not so bad on mobile because Sunrise is spinning it into the excellent Outlook email app for iPhone and Android. (If you don't like Outlook, check out Fantastical or Google Calendar.)

But it's a different story on the desktop.

Sunrise will be part of the desktop version of Outlook, which costs a whopping $150 as part of Microsoft Office. This is a huge letdown for people like me who use Sunrise on the desktop. What used to be an excellent, free app, is now part of the $150 Microsoft Office suite. (You can also subscribe to Office 365 for $100 per year.) There's no way around it.

So, what are you supposed to do?

Things look kind of hopeless right now.

For Mac users, the desktop version of Fantastical is great, but its $50 price tag can be tough to swallow. And don't even think about using Apple's calendar app for Mac. It stinks.

As for me, I'm going to keep using Sunrise on the desktop until August 31. Hopefully by then Fantastical drops its price or another developer creates something just as good for much cheaper. If that doesn't happen, I guess I'll either have to eat the $50 for Fantastical or endure Apple's calendar app.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here’s why your jeans have that tiny front pocket

The best desktop calendar app used to be free, but now Microsoft is making you pay $150 for it from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

Thursday, May 12, 2016

The Transport Guy: Google just made it super easy to find the right emoji on iPhone

Steve Kovach May 12, 2016 at 08:23AM

Sometimes it can be hard to find the emoji you're looking for.

There are dozens to choose from, and even though they're divided by category you can waste a lot of time swiping and poking around for the one you're looking for.

Google has a fix. Its new keyboard for iPhone includes a search tool for emojis. Just type in what you're looking for and you'll get a bunch of suggestions. The payments app Venmo has a similar feature, but the Google keyboard lets you use it in any app.

Here are a few examples:

google keyboard emoji search

google keyboard emoji search

google keyboard emoji search

You get the idea.

You can download the Google Keyboard for iPhone here.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How to see everything Google knows about you

Google just made it super easy to find the right emoji on iPhone from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

Wednesday, May 11, 2016

The Transport Guy: The first major Hyperloop test was a success

Cadie Thompson and Steve Kovach May 11, 2016 at 11:13AM

LAS VEGAS, NEVADA — The first major test of the Hyperloop is a success.

On Wednesday, the startup Hyperloop One gave a demonstration of its Hyperloop propulsion system, which will be used in a full-scale version by the end of the year.

The propulsion system is a sled on an open-air track at a site in the desert north of Las Vegas. Tech Insider's Cadie Thompson was there to witness the test.

Here's the first video she shot:

The sled traveled down the track at about 300 mph, but the full-scale Hyperloop will be able to reach up to 700 mph.

We'll have more coverage on Hyperloop One's big demo, so check back soon.

Join the conversation about this story »

The first major Hyperloop test was a success from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

The Transport Guy: Microsoft is killing the best calendar app

Steve Kovach May 11, 2016 at 10:02AM

man biking silhouette sunset

Sunrise is sunsetting.

The popular calendar app, which Microsoft bought in 2015 for a reported $100 million, is shutting down in a few days, the company announced on its blog Wednesday.

Instead, Sunrise's features will be rolled into Outlook, which is one of the best email apps. (Seriously. I've been using Outlook for over a year and I absolutely love it.)

This shouldn't come as a huge surprise though. Last fall, Sunrise announced that it would wind down development as its developers were integrated into the Outlook team.

Microsoft promised it wouldn't shut down Sunrise until it could incorporate all of its features into Outlook, and it seems like it has made good on that promise. The calendar tab in the Outlook mobile app looks almost like a clone of Sunrise.

Sunrise calendar app

If you're still in love with Sunrise, you'll be able to keep it on your phone for a few more months, but the company says it won't support it with bug fixes and other improvements. The app will stop functioning on August 31, 2016.

So what do you do if you don't want to use Outlook or you want to keep your email and calendar as separate apps? I'd suggest using Fantastical, which is just as good as Sunrise. If you use Google Calendar, the iOS and Android apps are really good too.

SEE ALSO: 13 ways HBO's 'Silicon Valley' nailed the real tech industry

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This new app makes texting on your iPhone a lot more fun

Microsoft is killing the best calendar app from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

Tuesday, May 10, 2016

The Transport Guy: Here's the most popular feature on the Amazon Echo

Steve Kovach May 10, 2016 at 11:35AM

amazon echo dot

Amazon's line of Echo speakers can do a lot of neat tricks.

You can order a pizza. Call an Uber. Get traffic and weather updates.

But despite all those features, the most popular function on the Echo is listening to music, Amazon's VP in charge of Echo Mike George said at the TechCrunch disrupt conference on Tuesday.

"Music is very popular," George said. "It's one of the most obvious use cases."

Instead of tapping and swiping an app to select a song like you have to do with Bluetooth speakers or the Sonos system, the Amazon Echo lets you control everything with your voice. Just say something like, "play the classic rock Pandora station" and you get exactly that. It's seamless and a delight to use.

Echo works with many of the major streaming services too: Spotify, Pandora, Amazon Music, Amazon Prime Music, iHeartRadio, and TuneIn.

When I was testing the Echo last year, music was my favorite feature. It was nice to come home, walk into my living room, and tell Alexa (the digital assistant that powers the Echo) to play my favorite Pandora station. The only reason I didn't end up buying the Echo for myself at the time was because Spotify didn't work with it and Amazon Prime's music selection is pretty weak compared to other services. (I ended up buying a Sonos speaker, which I also love.) Spotify didn't become available on Echo until a few months ago.

The Echo is an open platform, which means anyone can add new functionality to it over time. But despite all the cool things it can do, it sounds like music will always be at its core.

SEE ALSO: The inside story of how Amazon created Echo, the next billion-dollar business no one saw coming

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's how to see how much you've spent on Amazon in your lifetime

Here's the most popular feature on the Amazon Echo from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

The Transport Guy: This guy has an idea to deliver cheap, super-fast internet to your home

Steve Kovach May 10, 2016 at 08:00AM

Chet Kanojia starry CEO

The internet may be the most important pipe into your home, but at times it feels like progress is happening slowly.

Poor customer service. Dropped connections. Routers that behave erratically.

And the unfortunate truth is there's little incentive for things to get better because most internet providers effectively have a monopoly in the areas they serve. You either deal with them or you deal without internet.

Some companies like Google are trying to take on traditional internet providers with new fiber lines, but that's an expensive, messy process, which is why Google Fiber is only available in a handful of US cities.

So how do you get around it? Wireless.

This week the startup Starry launched the Starry Station, a $350 router with a touchscreen that's easy to set up and manage. It's a great device, but it's hundreds of dollars more expensive than your typical router. 

But there are more exciting things in the works at Starry beyond the Station. The company is actually working on a potentially revolutionary internet service that wirelessly beams internet to your home. It's cheaper to implement than laying fiber, and it's cheaper and significantly faster than what most people are getting now.

Here's how Starry internet works

The company sets up special transmitters called Starry Beams on rooftops that emit signals using a technology called millimeter waves. Those waves are picked up by receivers called Starry Points, which are installed in a customer's window sort of like an air conditioner. (Millimeter waves can't penetrate walls, so the receiver has to be outside.)

From there, you connect the Starry Point to your Starry Station router and you're good to use the internet in your home the way you normally would. The Starry Beam transmitters get the internet from fiber lines, the same lines wireless carriers like AT&T and Verizon plug into for their 4G networks. But Starry's service is much faster than what you get on your phone.

starry point

In an interview with Tech Insider, Starry CEO Chet Kanojia said the company will likely offer two tiers of speeds for customers, with the entry-level plan delivering about 50 megabits per second (Mbps) download speeds. The top-tier plan could deliver speeds up to a gigabit per second. To put that in perspective, 50 Mbps is over four times faster than the average internet connection in the United States, according to Akamai. Gigabit internet gets you 1,000 Mbps, which is fast enough to download a two-hour HD movie in just a few seconds. Most people have to pay a lot of money to get those speeds today, assuming it's available where they live.

Cost and availability

Starry promo video still

As for cost, Kanojia guaranteed Starry will be cheaper than standard wired broadband, but he wouldn't give any specifics. However, he did mention that a 50 Mbps connection in New York costs about $85 per month, so expect Starry to cost less than that.

Unlike Starry's wired rivals like Comcast, which plan to charge you more based on how much data you use, the company will only offer unlimited data. The only choice you have to make is the connection speed you want. Kanojia said that is likely to drive more people to consider other options like the wireless service.

"I think people will switch to somebody who provides the same or better product at a lower price," Kanojia said. 

Does it work?

Sound too good to be true? Some think it is.

Shortly after Starry's initial announcement earlier this year, the skepticism started piling up. The millimeter wave technology Starry uses isn't a new concept, and it has shown limitations in the past. Some have said it has a short range (200 meters or so) and can be affected by weather. Plus Facebook, Google, and Samsung are all experimenting with delivering the internet via millimeter waves. Google is even thinking about using drones to beam millimeter waves from the sky.

starry station

That's part of the reason why Starry is rolling out slowly, Kanojia said. It'll start in just a few neighborhoods in Boston this summer and expand from there once the Starry team thinks things are stable enough. Kanojia also claims that Starry's transmitters have a range of about a kilometer, and that they're actually overpowered in order to compensate for bad weather.

"In the early days we'll keep it constrained," Kanojia said, regarding service availability. "We'll only allow subscribers to sign up when ... they're able to look on app and see if their home is covered."

The company has vans patrolling the Boston area to test the connections in various locations. The beta service will only be available to a relative handful of users at first, Kanojia said, maybe just a few hundred.

Once Starry rolls out completely in Boston, it'll move to other cities. Kanojia said he hopes the service will be available in several cities within the first half of 2017. It's similar to the way he slowly rolled out services for his last company Aereo, which let you stream and record live network TV over the internet. (Aereo had to shut down after a lengthy legal battle with the networks, but it appears Starry should be pretty safe from crippling lawsuits, at least for now.)

There's plenty of reason to remain skeptical about Starry: It's a small company taking on some of the biggest corporations in the world, using technology that's been around for some time. But assuming it works as well in the real world as it does on paper, it could be the first company to offer an enticing alternative to wired internet.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The Comcast CEO says he’s not afraid of cord-cutters

This guy has an idea to deliver cheap, super-fast internet to your home from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

Monday, May 9, 2016

The Transport Guy: REVIEW: What it's like using the router of the future

Steve Kovach May 09, 2016 at 06:34AM

Starry Station Bookshelf

Routers suck.

And I'm not just talking about the setup process, which can feel like you need a computer science degree to get right.

There's also all the confusion after you set it up. Did my internet go out or is my router on the fritz? Am I on the right frequency? What the heck is 5 GHz anyway? What's the password? Is that all one word? Lowercase? 

You know exactly what I'm talking about.

The truth is this: Our gadgets have only gotten easier to use over the years, but the one thing that connects them all is still painfully difficult to manage.

So who's trying to fix it? 

It's not the big companies you'd expect. Instead, small startups like Starry, which launches its new Starry Station router this week, think they've cracked it.

I've been testing the $350 Starry Station for a little over a week. It hasn't fundamentally changed anything about the way I use WiFi, but it is much easier to use than any other router I've owned before. 

How it works

The Starry Station is packed with all the high-end networking gadgetry you'd expect from a premium router, but the real story is how friendly it is to use. It runs a heavily modified version of Android on a small touchscreen on the front for setup, retrieving your password and managing the devices connected to your network. It also gives your network a "health score" based on the strength of your connection and how much bandwidth the devices in your home are using up.

It can also test the speed of your connection (ever wonder if your provider is actually giving you the speeds you pay for?), help you troubleshoot problems when your internet goes down, and suggest which frequency to use based on how much data your device needs.

What it's like

The Starry Station worked perfectly for me over the last several days. I live alone, but I still have a ton of gadgets connected to my network: a laptop, phone, Apple TV, PlayStation 4, Wii U, and Sonos. I can only imagine what it's like in a household with a family of four or more. 

The setup was the best part. After plugging the Starry Station into power and a modem, the touchscreen walks you through the setup process, even suggesting cute names and randomly generated passwords for your network. (Of course, you can use any custom network name or password you want.) The Starry Station was designed for humans, not tech geeks, and I had my router up and running within minutes.

starry station router setup

After the setup, the Station calculates a health score based on your connection speed and strength and how much data your devices are using. Luckily, my connection is pretty good, and I've been hovering around 95% most of the time. I did have one moment of panic when my internet blipped out while I was trying to stream "Game of Thrones" the other day, but the Starry Station was able to automatically detect the problem and reset itself. I didn't even have to get up from the couch.

The Station's touchscreen gives you a snapshot of all your devices and lets you know which ones are currently online and using data. If one device needs a lot of bandwidth, say an Apple TV streaming Netflix, it'll suggest switching to a higher frequency band, while keeping your other gadgets on the lower bands. That always makes sure your connection is optimized for all your devices for what you need at any moment. I even got a notification to switch to a different band on my iPhone because I was too close to the router. Pretty cool.

Starry Station router health score

The screen represents your connected devices as bubbles floating around the main screen, and you can tap and swipe around to get stats on each one, test your connection, and set parental controls. There's also an iPhone and Android app that you can use to manage everything remotely. You can get details for each device and see how much data each one used throughout the day. Since most home internet providers give you unlimited data, I doubt many people will care how much they're using, but it is nice to finally have all that information easily available.

The Starry Station also looks good. It's a triangular prism in a white plastic shell, which is refreshing since most high-end routers look like frightening robots out of a sci-fi movie. According to Starry, the idea with the design was to encourage users to place their router where it can be seen and broadcast the best signal to your devices. Too many people hide their ugly routers behind computers or entertainment centers, which can interfere with your connection.

It ain't cheap

The only downside with the Starry Station is its cost. $350 is a lot to swallow for a router, considering you can get one that's just as good for hundreds less. I own a router from TP-Link that costs just $96, and it has pretty much the same connection specs as the Starry Station. It was a pain to set up, and I have to restart it from time to time when my internet goes down, but for that's a minor annoyance for me if it means saving $250.

StarryStation Web 05

The real shame is that if you want a user-friendly router you have to pay hundreds extra for it. It's not just the Starry Station either. Eero, which is made by another hardware startup, makes an excellent user-friendly router that starts at $199. And you have to pay $499 if you want the kit that extends your WiFi coverage to adequately blanket your entire house. We live in an era where we can call a cab with a few taps on an app, but if you want that same simplified experience to connect to WiFi, you have to pay out the nose for it. I'm sure cost will go down as these kind of devices become more common, but it's a lot to swallow for now.

Is it worth it?

If you need a new router and don't mind spending a lot, the Starry Station is a delight to use. I bet it's even better in a home with multiple people using multiple devices. (And parents will probably love being able to manage their kids' usage by literally blocking their WiFi connection during certain times.)

But for a lot of people, $350 is going to be too much. It's not a dealbreaker, but it's definitely worth asking yourself if you want to pay that much to get the router of the future today.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Animated map reveals the 550,000 miles of cable hidden under the ocean that power the internet

REVIEW: What it's like using the router of the future from Business Insider: Steve Kovach

Sunday, May 8, 2016

The Transport Guy: I was able to save $3,000 by quitting cable

Steve Kovach May 08, 2016 at 11:13AM

CABLE GUY_BIG

Ditching cable has turned out to be one of the best decisions I've ever made.

By my rough estimate, I've saved at least $3,000 since I quit cable four years ago, and I don't feel like I've really missed anything on TV.

Here's my setup:

  • I pay $60 per month for my internet service from Time Warner Cable.
  • I have a $25 RCA HD "rabbit ears" antenna that lets me watch network TV channels like NBC, ABC, and CBS for free over the air. I don't watch those channels very often, but it's great for major sporting events like the World Series or NFL games on Thursday nights and Sundays.
  • I have an Apple TV and use it mostly to watch Netflix ($8.99 per month, but going up to $9.99 per month soon). I also use Apple TV to buy TV shows like "Mad Men" and "The Walking Dead" that are available to watch on iTunes the day after they air on cable. Those are one-time costs of about $45 for the entire season. 

So, I'm paying $69 per month for Netflix and internet service, plus the occasional $45 for a full season of a TV show I enjoy.

I'd say at least 80% of my TV watching happens in Netflix. The rest is a mix of over-the-air network TV, shows from iTunes, and YouTube. And I've never really felt like I'm missing anything. I also recently signed up for HBO Now, which costs $15 per month, but mostly so I can watch "Game of Thrones." I might cancel after that.

Cable would've cost another $50 per month for the first year, and it would've gone up even more after that. Time Warner is never really clear on how much it raises your bill after that first year. I was pretty surprised when my internet bill jumped from $45 per month to $60 per month. So, assuming a similar jump for my TV service, let's say TV would've cost me $65 per month after the first year. If I add it all up, I've saved a little more than $2,900 over the last four years. And I think that's being generous considering all the hidden costs and other extras cable companies tend to sneak into your bill.

Mad Men

(I'm not factoring in Netflix because I would've paid for Netflix even if I had cable TV. I'm also ignoring the occasional one-time purchases of TV shows because they've been few and far between over the years.)

I also found another way to shave a few bucks off my Time Warner Cable bill each month. Instead of leasing the modem Time Warner Cable gave me for about $8 per month, I bought my own cable modem, the Motorola Arris Surfboard, from Amazon for $96. (You need to check with your internet provider for a list of compatible modems before you buy your own.) That may seem like a lot to pay up front, but it ended up paying for itself after a year.

Is this setup for everyone? No.

I love sports, but I'm not obsessed with them so I don't really miss ESPN. However, I know plenty of people out there would rather go without oxygen than go without ESPN. I'm sure there are also plenty of people who like watching cable news or niche channels like the HGTV and Food Network. My solution isn't for them.

But other than that, I never feel like I don't have something to watch. Netflix pretty much does the trick for me. And realizing all these years later that I've saved $3,000 is icing on the cake.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How to see if someone is mooching off your Netflix account

I was able to save $3,000 by quitting cable from Business Insider: Steve Kovach